Does the page make the buying decision clear?
Distinct shopping contexts surface objections, missing proof and message mismatch.
Output · sharper hypothesisMCPs / Conversion MCP
Most stores send every ad to the same page and hope. Conversion MCP watches where the money lands, builds the campaign and product pages to match, audits each one against buyers and a real Chrome session, runs the test and keeps what won. Kira operates it from Slack and email, so the whole thing reaches you as a draft and a question.
Watch
Store, campaign, performance and prior-learning signals arrive as one ranked queue instead of four dashboards nobody opens. Kira brings you the next thing worth building, already drafted.
Build
A campaign lander answers the promise that brought the visitor; a product page answers the decision in front of that buyer. Both come out of the same brand rules, so the page reads like your store wrote it.
Verify
Buyer simulations argue with the page: the missing proof, the objection it skips, the promise it drops. A real Chrome session checks whether it physically works — the hidden CTA, the overlay on mobile, the button that does nothing. The two verdicts stay separate, so a persuasion problem never gets filed as a bug.
Distinct shopping contexts surface objections, missing proof and message mismatch.
Output · sharper hypothesisReal rendering, clicks and screenshots catch hidden controls, overlays and broken interactions.
Output · mechanical pass / failProve + remember
The control is never touched, the guardrails are visible the whole time, and no test reaches your traffic without your yes. When the winner is called, the reason becomes a rule the next brief already knows.
The operating model
You brief her in Slack or email and approve what ships. The queue, the builder, the audits, the experiments and everything the store has already learned sit behind her, so the small fix stops waiting on a ticket and you stop being the bottleneck for it.
Meet Kira